This morning I finally got an opportunity to take my 2026 Mazda MX-5 up to the local mountain roads. The verdict so far is: it’s a bit more floppy than I remembered. And that’s not a bad thing.
Coming out of a BMW M2 that’s flat and sharp at all times, the Miata’s innate softness and rolling character is quite the contrast. With the Mazda you definitely cannot ham fist it into a corner; the driver must work with the delayed fluidity that the car has. You walk the Miata on its tippy-toes, rather than bludgeoning the tarmac with maximum force. The car floats and undulates with the road imperfections, and you have to let it do its thing and not force it into something that it isn’t.
I’ve watch and read many reviews on the ND Miata, and universally it seems people complain about the car’s built-in softness in the suspension. There’s too much body roll. I think problem here is people are taking the incorrect lens to view the car. You cannot treat the MX-5 like a modern sports car. It doesn’t have the flatness or immediacy of a Porsche 911 because it’s not that kind of car.
The Miata is more akin to the 60s sports coupe with skinny tires and massive suspension motion. Watch this Goodwood Revival race for an example of the sort of cars I am talking about. Instead of wishing it corners flatly with quicker reflexes, the driver should work with the MX-5. Let the motion and body roll inform you of how to best chuck it into a corner. Because you can easily tell when the car is upset: massive body lean, but going nowhere quick.
I reckon owners that modify the MX-5 by adding in suspension stiffness fundamentally miss the entire point of the car. I don’t think we should be turning it into a Honda S2000. There’s plenty of other sports cars with firmer suspension and faster steering controls. You buy a Mazda MX-5 because you can dance with it.
Saturday therapy.