Too many Chinas

In my many yearly travels back home to China, I’ve taken the route through Hong Kong. An arduous 15 hour plane ride from SFO to HKG, followed by another two hour train ride into mainland China back to Guangzhou. Factoring in commuting and wait times, it’s an easy 24 hours from closing the door to my home, to opening the door to the hotel. Why put myself through such pilgrimage year after year? The food. Cantonese cuisine is undefeated.

A slight pain-point when taking the transfer through Hong Kong is that you’re essentially crossing two borders. Hong Kong customs welcomes you in HKG, while China customs checks you again before you’re allowed to board the train. This is a logistical inconsistency that undermines the whole “One China” attitude. If it’s truly One China, then why the heck am I subjected to two sets of immigration checks? The Hong Kong one at the airport should more than suffice.

Then there’s restrictions on how frequent Chinese nationals can visit the Special Administrative Regions like Hong Kong and Macau. Restrictions that logically should not exist if it is truly one China. That would be like if I’m only allowed to visit Florida - as a Californian - for only a few weeks out of the year. Though that would be just fine because I’ve zero desire to visit Florida. Everybody knows the best Disney theme park is the one in Tokyo, Japan.

The One China policy is a mere political bluster; a power-play by the reigning communist regime. The party’s legitimacy is predicated on being recognized by the outside world as the de facto China. Anything that can threaten that legitimacy - however small - must be censored immediately. You think the Taiwanese national team really wants to compete in world sports under the “Chinese Taipei” banner?

Come to think of it, why allow athletes from Hong Kong and Macau compete under anything but China? One China, one national team, right? If anything, Taiwanese athletes, you guys come on over as well!

View fullsize

Hand-pulled salty chicken is worth the 15 hour flight.

Do not pass go

One thing I realized as I was leaving Guangzhou (China) heading to South Korea: the United States don’t care when people are departing for international. There’s no customs check, there’s no immigration check. America is probably so ecstatic at you leaving the country that they don’t want to spook you into changing your mind with additional barriers.

The only stamp on your non-U.S. passport when you visit the States is the entry.

(Countries I’ve visited) China has immigration control on exit. So does, Thailand, Japan, and Taiwan. This creates a need for travelers to get to the respective airports earlier. The security check presents enough of a choke point - why add another one? Homeland Security - or whatever a country’s equivalent - should only care about what’s coming in. You know, protecting the homeland. It’s the destination country’s problem to handle if a traveler ends up being the unsavory kind.

Surely a flight manifest is enough data for a country to determine if a person has left the country. Unless of course your name is Carlos Ghosn, and you had to smuggle your way out of Japan in a cargo box.

The way America handles this is the right way - immigration upon entry only. Unless of course the government of a particular country wants to prevent its citizens from so easily leaving its borders. Though even North Korea wouldn’t need immigration check upon exit? Because I am (hopefully correctly) assuming that there isn’t an airline in the world who would sell/operate a flight out of the upper Joseon peninsula to a North Korean citizen.

Look at that, America doing something outside of international norms, but it’s actually good.

Through the looking glass.